Some of you might have taken the time to view the video I posted in my last blog called, Green it or Destroy the Planet. I've been looking further into this organization and it's relationship to Government, industry, religion, science and environmentalism. They created a document called the Earth Charter, of which all the High Priests and Priestesses of environmentalism, want all the nations of the world to  be legally binding to.  It is promoted and funded by all the usual cast of characters who would like to control our daily activities. Maurice Strong, Rockefellers, Rothchilds, and Al Gore to name a few.

It basically, wants to coordinate the activities of all human behaviors and events at every level. In fact to accomplish it's stated goals it would have to create a world army or police force to enforce it's mandate, ( that's my own opinion but to achieve what they want I see no other way). I read the Earth Charter today and after you get past all the flowery language, you begin to see what this document is all about. It really confirmed to me how incredibly deceitful these leaders of the environmental movement are. Like religious leaders of the past promising eternal life if you comply to their rules or death and damnation  if you do not, these new Green religious leaders promise the World will be a wonderful "sustainable world" if we follow their laws and a world of chaos if we do not.

It took two thousand years before people started to see how religion and the good men who started those religions  were used to control mans behavior for their own profits and self importance. Let me make clear I do not criticize any religion or any religious leader that preached "love thy neighbor" as most did and do. My complaint is with the indignity that is brought to them when used for self profiting or malevolent reasons.

So why the Rockefeller connection? I wish not to use bad language here, but I am definitely feeling the urge. The Rockefeller I refer to is Steven Clark Rockefeller (born 1936), a fourth-generation member of the Rockefeller family and a former dean of Middlebury College, is a philanthropist who focuses on education, Planned Parenthood, human rights and environmental causes. He is an educated man so he has no right to claim ignorance to what he did.

While reading the Earth Charter I noticed a link to a book Mr. Rockefeller wrote the forward to. http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/articles/608/1/Gandhi-and-the-Earth-Charter--new-inspiring-book-available/Page1.html

This book tries to link  the ideas of the Earth Charter to Ghandi's ideas. So what's the big deal? If you know anything about Gandhi he sure the hell wouldn't want a World central government body dictating to his followers how to live their lives. For World sakes he fought against colonialism and the shackles of British power. To add insult to injury the fucking organization is run by the same asshole families that controlled India and enslaved it's people. That would be like Cecile Rhodes  of South Africa coming back from the dead and  saying Bishop Desmond Tutu would endorse Apartheid.

Like powerful greedy men from the past and present use the names of Jesus and Mohammad for their own selfish reasons, so too has Steven Clark Rockefeller used the name of Gandhi for his own self aggrandizement, selfish reasons and to control peoples behaviors.
It is this type of arrogance from elitist that support man made global climate change that confirms my belief, it's a bunch of rubbish.

Some quotes from Gandhi. Ask yourself would Gandhi endorse a charter that would make the entire world a slave of it's mandates.

In my humble opinion, non-cooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good.

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy?

The moment the slave resolves that he will no longer be a slave, his fetters fall. He frees himself and shows the way to others. Freedom and slavery are mental states.

Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.

Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err. It passes my comprehension how human beings, be they ever so experienced and able, can delight in depriving other human beings of that precious right.


Here is a passionate way of making my thoughts understood.




Or this